Références bibliographiques
1. B.E. Rubinoff, J.G. Shenker. New advances in sex preselection. Fertil Steril 1996 ; 66 : 343-50.
2. V.J. Grant. Sex predetermination and the ethics of sex selection. Hum Reprod 2006 ; 21 : 1659-61.
3. Recommandations du Comité de la FIGO sur les Aspects Éthiques de la Reproduction Humaine et la Santé des Femmes. Sélection du sexe. p.71. FIGO Ed 2000.
4. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Preconception gender selection for non medical reasons. Fertil Steril 2001 ; 75 : 861-4.
5. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Sex selection and preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Fertil Steril 1999 ; 72 : 595-8.
6. J. Savulescu, E. Dahl. Sex selection and preimplantation diagnosis. A response to the Ethics Commmittee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine. Hum Reprod 2000 ; 15 : 1879-80.
7. A. Malpani, A. Malpani, D. Modi. preimplantation sex selection for family balancing in India. Hum Reprod 2002 ; 17: 11-2.
8. Conseil de l’Europe. Traités Européens STE N° 164. Convention pour la Protection des Droits de l’Homme et de la Dignité de l’Être Humain à l’égard des applications de la biologie et de la médecine Site de référence : http://www.inserm.fr/Ethique.nfs ou http://conventions.coe.int
9. Sen Armatya. More than 100 million women are missing. New York Revew of Books, N.Y, Dec. 20th 1990.
10. Isabelle Attané. Une Chine sans femmes ? Perrin Asie 2005.
11. N.D. Kristof. China. Ultrasound abuse in sex selection. Women’s Health J 1993 ; 4: 16-7.
12. G. Mudur. Indian medical authorities act on antenatal sex selection. BMJ 1999 ; 319 : 401.
13. Public Interest Litigation filed by Centre for Health and Allied Themes (CEHAT) and others in the Supreme Court of India in 2000. J Indian Med Assoc 2003 ; 12 : 721-5.
14. J.G. Shenker. Gender selection : cultural and religious perspectives. Assist Reprod Genet 2002 ; 19 : 400-10.
15. D.C. Wertz, J.C. Flechter. Ethical issues in prenatal sex selection : a survey of geneticists in 37 nations. Soc Sci Med 1998 ; 46 : 255-73.
16. M.I. Evans, A. Drugan, S.F. Bottoms, L.D. Platt, C.A. Rodeck, P.G. Hansmann, J.C. Flechter. Attitudes on the ethics of abortion, sex selection and selective pregnancy termination among health care professionals, ethicists and clergy likely to encounter such situations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991 ; 164 : 1092-9.
17. Z. Kmietowicz. Fertilization authority recommends a ban on sex selection. BMJ 2003 ; 327 : 1123.
18. David McCarthy. Why sex selection should be legal. J Med Ethics 2001 ; 27 : 302-307.
19. J.M. Berkowitz. Sexism and racism in preconceptive trait selection. Fertil Steril 1999 ; 71 : 415-7.
20. American College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Committee opinion on sex selection. Obstet Gynecol 1996, n°177.
21. United Nations. Gender equality, equity and empowerment of women. In : Population and development programme of action adopted at the International Conference on Population and Development ; 1994, Sept 5-13 ; Cairo, New York, (NY) UN, 1995 p17-21.
2. V.J. Grant. Sex predetermination and the ethics of sex selection. Hum Reprod 2006 ; 21 : 1659-61.
3. Recommandations du Comité de la FIGO sur les Aspects Éthiques de la Reproduction Humaine et la Santé des Femmes. Sélection du sexe. p.71. FIGO Ed 2000.
4. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Preconception gender selection for non medical reasons. Fertil Steril 2001 ; 75 : 861-4.
5. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Sex selection and preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Fertil Steril 1999 ; 72 : 595-8.
6. J. Savulescu, E. Dahl. Sex selection and preimplantation diagnosis. A response to the Ethics Commmittee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine. Hum Reprod 2000 ; 15 : 1879-80.
7. A. Malpani, A. Malpani, D. Modi. preimplantation sex selection for family balancing in India. Hum Reprod 2002 ; 17: 11-2.
8. Conseil de l’Europe. Traités Européens STE N° 164. Convention pour la Protection des Droits de l’Homme et de la Dignité de l’Être Humain à l’égard des applications de la biologie et de la médecine Site de référence : http://www.inserm.fr/Ethique.nfs ou http://conventions.coe.int
9. Sen Armatya. More than 100 million women are missing. New York Revew of Books, N.Y, Dec. 20th 1990.
10. Isabelle Attané. Une Chine sans femmes ? Perrin Asie 2005.
11. N.D. Kristof. China. Ultrasound abuse in sex selection. Women’s Health J 1993 ; 4: 16-7.
12. G. Mudur. Indian medical authorities act on antenatal sex selection. BMJ 1999 ; 319 : 401.
13. Public Interest Litigation filed by Centre for Health and Allied Themes (CEHAT) and others in the Supreme Court of India in 2000. J Indian Med Assoc 2003 ; 12 : 721-5.
14. J.G. Shenker. Gender selection : cultural and religious perspectives. Assist Reprod Genet 2002 ; 19 : 400-10.
15. D.C. Wertz, J.C. Flechter. Ethical issues in prenatal sex selection : a survey of geneticists in 37 nations. Soc Sci Med 1998 ; 46 : 255-73.
16. M.I. Evans, A. Drugan, S.F. Bottoms, L.D. Platt, C.A. Rodeck, P.G. Hansmann, J.C. Flechter. Attitudes on the ethics of abortion, sex selection and selective pregnancy termination among health care professionals, ethicists and clergy likely to encounter such situations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991 ; 164 : 1092-9.
17. Z. Kmietowicz. Fertilization authority recommends a ban on sex selection. BMJ 2003 ; 327 : 1123.
18. David McCarthy. Why sex selection should be legal. J Med Ethics 2001 ; 27 : 302-307.
19. J.M. Berkowitz. Sexism and racism in preconceptive trait selection. Fertil Steril 1999 ; 71 : 415-7.
20. American College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Committee opinion on sex selection. Obstet Gynecol 1996, n°177.
21. United Nations. Gender equality, equity and empowerment of women. In : Population and development programme of action adopted at the International Conference on Population and Development ; 1994, Sept 5-13 ; Cairo, New York, (NY) UN, 1995 p17-21.
Posté par J. Milliez le 24.11.06 - Ajouter un commentaire
<< Page d'accueil